Why it’s so hard to move down-market

Great startups pivot. As they build and sell products, they validate and invalidate their assumptions. Most importantly, they learn from this new information and change tact.

The most significant startup pivots regard product-market fit. For example:

Many founders believe they can perform one of these pivots while continuing to focus on their existing market, problem, or solution. So, instead of “let’s do this instead”, they say, “let’s do this as well”. In general, startups should remain focused on one solution to one problem for one market for as long as possible. This focus is the way you can best maximise growth for your business. But today, I want to explore the two most tempting pivots for B2B startup founders.

Moving down-market

Almost every founder I have worked with has had the idea to expand their total addressable market by moving down-market. Most markets have many small businesses and fewer larger businesses. So, it’s logical to target the smaller end of town so you can acquire a greater number of customers.

However, if you have already found product-market fit in your current market, it is challenging to move down-market. This is because:

In contrast, it’s relatively easy for software startups to move up-market. Or, it’s easier to target new prospects larger than those you traditionally target. This is because:

This is why I advise startups with sufficient runway to target their smallest viable customer. The smallest business that they are likely to ever want to target. Starting at the bottom end of town makes it much easier to grow your business and your product while progressively targeting larger customers.

I also recommend the following:

The best reason to move down-market is to avoid disruption. Because it is easy to start simple and progressively add complexity, competitors who start down-market from you can catch up to you quickly. They are better positioned to do this than you are to move down-market, which is why I think the best way to move down-market is to create a new product and disrupt yourself. Starting fresh often (though not always) is easier than trying to devolve your existing product. At the same time, this is a massively expensive undertaking — you should only do it when you are large enough to take this on in parallel to the maintenance of your original product.

Note that this is potentially the only time it makes sense to start from scratch. Other motivations for a fresh start (e.g., to improve your technology stack) are often bad ideas, with progressive evolution being the preferred approach.

Solving additional problems through new products

It is logical to think that you can drastically grow the total addressable market for your business by building a second, third, or fourth product. This idea is supported by the fact that most highly successful companies sell more than one product.

I completely agree with this logic. Creating new products to sell to your existing customers makes a tonne of sense. This is a great way to earn more money without having to acquire net-new customers — this cost-effective growth is one of the best things about the SaaS business model.

Timing is where most startup leaders get this wrong, though. By prematurely expanding into additional product lines or trying to sell their existing product to another market with a slightly different use case, they dilute their focus from a product development and customer acquisition perspective. The primary risk here is opportunity cost: by taking on something new, you’re neglecting improvements to your core product which could lead to better outcomes.

The best time to start to build new products is when you are earning enough from your core product that it is beginning to feel like you don’t need as many people as you can afford. A close second is when you’re starting to feel like you’re at risk of exhausting your current target market. If you wait until one of these criteria is met, you can expand your suite without harm to the existing business opportunity.

Privacy and terms

I care about privacy as much as you do. I will only use your email address to send you this newsletter or to reach out to you directly, and you can unsubscribe at any time. I will not share, sell, or rent your email address to any third party, though I do store it the software I use to dispatch emails.

The information provided on this blog is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. The content on this blog is not a substitute for professional financial advice. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of other organizations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this blog and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its use. The author may hold positions in the companies or products discussed on this blog. Always conduct your own research and consult a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Subscribe for advice

Free weekly advice covering product strategy, development operations, building teams and more.

More advice

Understanding tacit knowledge

As great as it would be to solve all problems with clearly defined processes and documented knowledge, the reality is that most organisational knowledge tends to be tacit. So, companies should factor this into their ways of working.

Australia to quash angel investing

The Australian Government is about to make it nearly impossible for successful startup workers to reinvest their earnings into new startups. Let’s explore the upcoming changes and how they will affect startups, workers, and the Australian economy.

Stepping on toes

How much should competent people, confidently managing their responsibilities, meddle in the affairs of other teams they perceive to be dropping the ball?