Understanding tacit knowledge

Startups contain a lot of knowledge. While it’s easy to document knowledge like product specifications, customer profiles, pricing, and processes, some organisational knowledge is difficult to write down and, therefore, goes under appreciated. We call this tacit knowledge.

Tacit knowledge is unwritten, unspoken, and often unconscious knowledge. One’s individual experiences and intuitions form the basis of tacit knowledge. When thanks to their experience, someone handles a situation effectively without knowing how to clearly explain their process, this is thanks to this unconscious knowledge.

As great as it would be to solve all problems with clearly defined processes and documented knowledge1, the reality is that most organisational knowledge tends to be tacit. So, companies should factor this into their ways of working. Research has demonstrated the value of tacit knowledge in organisations in two ways. First, by measuring the impact of knowledgeable employees leaving the organisation2 (we’ve all experienced this first hand). Second, by showing the effectiveness of various methods for encouraging tacit knowledge development3. This latter point is good news for startup leaders because it tells us that, while it may be difficult to write down this type of information, it’s still possible to encourage it to spread.

Tacit knowledge is not easily shared or articulated, as it often requires personal contact, regular interaction, and trust to effectively transfer from one person to another. So, the best way to spread it is to encourage personal contact and regular interaction and to build trust within teams.

First, teams should tackle work in groups. Engineers should participate in pair programming. Salespeople should listen in on each other’s calls. Customer service agents should tackle tickets in pairs. Coupling new recruits with experienced employees is especially important for tacit knowledge transfer, so include this practice in your employee onboarding process.

Second, teams should share their work with others. Engineers should demonstrate what they’ve built and explain the decisions they made along the way. Salespeople should demonstrate how they won their deals. All-hands meetings are a great forum for this type of knowledge sharing.

Third, encourage cross-functional collaboration. Time with an engineer will teach a support agent why the product works as it does. Time with a salesperson will teach an engineer what customers care about. Many startups go too far to insulate teams from internal distractors. While you don’t want teams constantly harassing each other when they could solve problems independently, you also don’t want silos. Pay attention, and you may realise some of the best performers are employees with good relationships outside their immediate team.

Fourth, hire for tacit knowledge. People with experience in similar businesses targeting the same customer profile will likely come with valuable tacit knowledge. If you find someone with fantastic tacit knowledge that enables them to ramp up quickly in their new role, hire some of their former colleagues.

Lastly, get your hands dirty as a leader. In the early days of a startup, even founders can lack the depth of tacit knowledge required to succeed. First-hand experience selling, supporting and designing your product will build the type of knowledge you’ll later need to transfer to others.

Because people learn tacit knowledge by osmosis, the methods above are especially beneficial for remote teams. A lack of tacit knowledge transfer may partially explain why some studies report that remote work leads to fewer innovations4 despite delivering greater productivity5. If your team works remotely6, ensure that time spent together maximises the type of collaborative activities outlined above.

Footnotes

  1. Don’t use the existence of tacit knowledge as an excuse to avoid documentation. A lot of knowledge can and should be documented. ↩︎

  2. Abdullah Gaghman (2020): “The Impact of Knowledge Behavioural Factors on Tacit Knowledge Retention.” Published online by Knowledge E. ↩︎

  3. Rajendran Muthuveloo (2017): “The impact of tacit knowledge management on organizational performance.” Published online by ScienceDirect. ↩︎

  4. Yiling Lin (2023): “Remote Collaboration Fuses Fewer Breakthrough Ideas.” Published online by arXiv. ↩︎

  5. Nick Bloom (2023): “Does working from home damage productivity?.” Published online by The Hill. ↩︎

  6. I recommend very early-stage startups co-locate wherever possible and transition to remote-first after achieving product-market fit (if they wish to). In my opinion, mature startups suffer less from the downsides and get more value from the upsides of remote work. ↩︎

Subscribe for advice

Free weekly advice covering product strategy, development operations, building teams and more.

More advice

Great startups lean into chaos

Most managers in early-stage startups think that chaos is inversely correlated with results. That is, they think that chaos breeds bad results and an unhealthy environment, while order breeds good results and a more harmonious environment. This perception is wrong.

 
Salespeople need decisive decision makers

The best salespeople have great intuitions for which prospects are most decisive, and how to get access to better contacts. Everyone else wastes their time talking to people who will never buy, no matter how appealing they make it sound.

 
Startups must work smart and hard

To win, startups need to lean into their advantages because they’re a decade away from the kinds of moats enjoyed by established corporations. This means they need to work smart (i.e., mostly do the right things) and work hard (i.e., execute at a pace and with intense risk tolerance).

 
Privacy and terms

I will only use your email address to send you this newsletter or to reach out to you directly, and you can unsubscribe at any time. I will not share, sell, or rent your email address to any third party, though I do store it the software I use to dispatch emails.

The information provided on this blog is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. The content on this blog is not a substitute for professional financial advice. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of other organizations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this blog and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its use. The author may hold positions in the companies or products discussed on this blog. Always conduct your own research and consult a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.