Why startups should act their age

When an early-stage startup acts like a mature software corporation, progress grinds to a halt. Because the journey towards product-market fit requires high-velocity experimentation, an early-stage startup hindered by a mature business’s ways of working could fail before it gets off the ground. Speed is more important than quality.

Conversely, when a mature product organisation behaves like a startup, with a lackadaisical attitude towards quality and inefficient business operations, it is consumed by technical issues, bugs, tech debt, and HR problems. Quality becomes very important at the expense of speed.

This principle is one of the reasons why it’s so challenging to build a successful startup: what works for you in the early days can be your downfall after you’ve achieved some scale. Similarly, what worked for you at your previous job (at a mature software company) will encumber your new venture. As a result, many startups get stuck in quicksand between product-market fit and scaled success.

The best strategies and ways of working for early-stage companies can lead to chaos and quality problems for mature companies. Similarly, early-stage companies that adopt mature ways of working can move too slowly and burn through runway.
The best strategies and ways of working for early-stage companies can lead to chaos and quality problems for mature companies. Similarly, early-stage companies that adopt mature ways of working can move too slowly and burn through runway.

If your business has yet to find a product-market fit, your primary goal is to find it. During this phase:

After product-market fit, companies must scale their product into their target market. During this phase:

To effectively make decisions, founders and product leaders need awareness of which of these two mindsets to employ. This knowledge is vital when you take advice from consultants and resources like books and blogs: most advice is only relevant before or after product-market fit is found. Applying feedback intended for mature businesses to your small-and-scrappy startup can be a real distraction while applying feedback intended for businesses still searching for product-market fit to a scale-up can lead to an unstructured, chaotic environment. For example, many early-stage companies agonise over technical debt and exhaustive employee onboarding plans when, as important as these things will soon be, they are currently an unnecessary distraction.

Subscribe for advice

Free weekly advice covering product strategy, development operations, building teams and more.

More advice

Building a committed, motivated team

When an early stage employee can satisfy their own needs by simply succeeding in their role, you’ll achieve better results with less management overhead. When an employee needs more than you can give them, they will distract you from focusing on the most important things.

 
Disrupt and defend with platform envelopment

It can be difficult to convince a customer to adopt your product when they already have a solution they’re happy with. This is why disruptive products typically need to be radically better, radically cheaper, or both. However, thanks to platform envelopment, it’s actually possible for a notably worse app to disrupt superior incumbents.

 
Great startups lean into chaos

Most managers in early-stage startups think that chaos is inversely correlated with results. That is, they think that chaos breeds bad results and an unhealthy environment, while order breeds good results and a more harmonious environment. This perception is wrong.

 
Privacy and terms

I will only use your email address to send you this newsletter or to reach out to you directly, and you can unsubscribe at any time. I will not share, sell, or rent your email address to any third party, though I do store it the software I use to dispatch emails.

The information provided on this blog is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. The content on this blog is not a substitute for professional financial advice. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of other organizations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this blog and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its use. The author may hold positions in the companies or products discussed on this blog. Always conduct your own research and consult a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.