Employer brand for startups

Recruiting is often the biggest challenge for early-stage startups. When your product is unproven, your credibility as a founder is yet to be established, and you compete with established employers, it can be difficult to convince anyone to join your venture. Corporate tech companies have bigger budgets, generous perks, and great brand recognition. But startup building is all about punching above your weight. Recruiting gets easier as a startup grows and establishes itself as a desirable brand to work for. It is possible to accelerate this process with intentional employer brand design.

Understanding employer brand

Startups with a strong employer brand find it much easier to recruit new staff. Instead of paying recruiters for expensive outreach-driven recruiting, candidates come to them. They don’t need to work as hard to sell the dream to prospective employees. They attract the highest-quality talent in the market.

A brand can mean different things to different audiences. Your value proposition for customers differs from your value proposition for employees or partners. Still, all the principles of good branding apply to employer brands. Like product brands, employer brands consist of two core elements:

A well-positioned brand that nobody knows about is worthless. A famous but poorly-positioned brand is a public relations disaster. Both of these areas need investment.

Employer brand positioning

How you position yourself in the talent market will greatly impact your ability to recruit. Startups lean more heavily on employer brand positioning than awareness because fame is difficult for fledgling, unproven companies.

When corporate technology companies position themselves as employers, they prioritise the following value propositions:

Most startups copy these value propositions to establish themselves as desirable employers. While this works for some generously-funded ventures, most startups cannot compete with established technology companies on any of these dimensions. This is why startups should instead take a completely different approach.

Corporate technology companies are safe, slow, and well-compensated places to work. Startups are risky, fast, stressful, and resource-poor. When a startup adopts the corporate tech talent playbook, they not only fail but also attract the wrong type of talent. The kind of person who desires an easy, well-compensated cruise through corporate tech life is likely to fail at a startup. Startups that act like corporate tech companies will attract people who want to work for corporate tech companies. This is not to say that people with corporate tech experience can’t succeed in startups — the same employee can have very different needs at various career stages.

Instead, startups should differentiate themselves from their competition in the talent market. While every startup needs a different employer brand, some of the dimensions to consider are:

Great brands are defined not only by what they are but what they are not. To create a great brand, lean into the strengths of your startup. But, more importantly, don’t try to pretend you are something you’re not.

Employer brand awareness

While some startups achieve fame very quickly, most cannot compete with established tech brands for attention. Fortunately, positioning is much more important than fame. For every founder who is laser-focused on startup building, there are many more who spend their time building fame on LinkedIn or Twitter. Fame is worthless when you have nothing to sell.

For many startups, the best way to build employer brand awareness is the same as the best way to build product brand awareness: starting with a niche. By focusing on a niche, it is easier to attract the attention of the most important part of your overall audience. From there, you can expand into other niches, and before you know it, you’ll have broad brand awareness.

As a resource-poor startup, your best bet is to be physically present. The room needs to be small enough that you can stand out but big enough that it adds a valuable cohort to your audience. It’s hard to be the most attractive place in the world for JavaScript developers to work. It’s much easier to be the best place for Next.JS developers in Chicago.

Privacy and terms

I care about privacy as much as you do. I will only use your email address to send you this newsletter or to reach out to you directly, and you can unsubscribe at any time. I will not share, sell, or rent your email address to any third party, though I do store it the software I use to dispatch emails.

The information provided on this blog is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. The content on this blog is not a substitute for professional financial advice. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of other organizations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this blog and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its use. The author may hold positions in the companies or products discussed on this blog. Always conduct your own research and consult a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Subscribe for advice

Free weekly advice covering product strategy, development operations, building teams and more.

More advice

Australia to quash angel investing

The Australian Government is about to make it nearly impossible for successful startup workers to reinvest their earnings into new startups. Let’s explore the upcoming changes and how they will affect startups, workers, and the Australian economy.

 
Stepping on toes

How much should competent people, confidently managing their responsibilities, meddle in the affairs of other teams they perceive to be dropping the ball?

 
Processes make inexperienced people wiser, and experienced people dumber

People hate process, but process is crucial to scaling a businesses. Today, we explore the difference between good and bad processes, and ways to ensure startups can benefit from standardisation, rather than suffer.